Given a few contextual clues, like whether the eyelids are open or shut, it can work out whether it's seeing something or remembering it. A: Well, Roger Penrose has given lots of new-age crackpots ammunition by suggesting that at some fundamental scale, quantum mechanics might be relevant for consciousness. What was new? Short Range Tests of Newtons Inverse-Square Law. "What the Bleep" begins in NOVA-like fashion: galaxies swirl and scientists--we aren't told who they are until the end--expound on quantum mechanics and the nature of the universe. So does classical physics. And wait-the human body is mostly water! or call us at 1-617-450-2300. Q. bleep blorp!" I implore all of you to ignore Rubio's critics and acknowledge that the senator from Florida is absolutely correct. It's certainly not. Then comes "Carl Sagan Meets Madame Blavatsky." Mark was born in Johannesburg, South Africa . What the Bleep!? We might be able to create quantum computers, for example, that will simultaneously do many different calculations at once, because the quantum world is capable of doing many things at the same time. And you'd do the study without knowing what had been 'said' to the water specimens, so your subjective opinions wouldn't colour the results. In one experiment, people who were walking across a college campus were asked by a stranger for directions. The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. (2005)", "Cult Science Dressing Up Mysticism as Quantum Physics", "The New Age Spiritualist and the Old School Scholars", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know!%3F&oldid=1139210194, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, That the universe is best seen as constructed from thoughts and ideas rather than from. The meditation may not have helped the victims of violent crime, but it did win Hagelin the 1994 Ig Nobel Peace Prize. I want to mention another point Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. One other area where quantum mechanics works on a macroscopic scale is in superconductivity and superfluidity. But Hagelin's use of the term "achieved" for the drop in crime is a bit strong. Right after the Velvet Revolution in 1989 (the collapse of the Czechoslovak communism), many new spiritual and other directions were trying to find their ways to the new free countries. That's its claim anyway. Viewers instead are fed a nauseating stream of nonsense that traces back to the teaching of a woman who claims to channel a 35,000-year-old deity. Is this a hoax to promote positivity? A: Absolutely. If you have questions about your account, please Science Monitor has expired. Also, the movie suggests that the quantum idea of matter embracing all its possible states at once applies to the larger world of people and rocks. Author, speaker, and award-winning Writer/Director/Producer Mark Vicente was part of the creative team behind the sleeper hit "What The Bleep Do We Know?!". Publishers Weekly What the Bleep Do We Know!? what the bleep do we know watch online free, what the bleep do we know trailer, what the bleep do we know movie, what the bleep do we know debunked, what the bleep do . Featured individuals [ edit] The film features interview segments of: And there's the matter of scale the brain lights up in scans much more brightly when you're seeing something than when you're reminiscing. The web makes all such things available today, so I can give you a Google link to a page about Maharishis unified field theory, http://www.worldpeaceendowment.org/invincibility/invincibility6.html. They may applaud the central tenets of the movie, but not its disjointed narrative, clunky acting, bizarre thematic segues, and faux "facts." We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations. To date, there has been no response as to where the information which lead to the story about the indians not being able to see the ships of Columbus originated from. Amanda is a divorced woman who makes a living as a photographer. As one of the film's characters gushes early in the proceedings, 'The moment we acknowledge the quantum self, we say that somebody has become enlightened'. Is that last line The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable some sort of strange attack on SUSY models? . He announced in 1994 (one year after the study) that violent crime had decreased 18%. Categories conflate, confound, connect", "Our power is in our ability to decide - Can you? Particles are fluctuations the rules of physics say it's perfectly fine for them to exist at some time and/or place and to be non-existent at another time and/or place. [12][13] Lisa Randall refers to the film as "the bane of scientists". (Source: iStockphoto). Your subscription to [2]. The reason you should be suspicious is because we don't even understand classical consciousness. You can't change the world by thinking about it. On certain scales, for certain times, in certain regions, everything goes and strange things happen. The movie features other proclaimed scientists who . for only $16.05 $11/page. unless you renew or For many years in the early-mid-eighties, the Maharishi was pushing N=8 supergravity as the unified field theory, I remember a colorful poster explaining how it agreed exactly with his philosophy that many people posted on their walls. Do we know" . In a corrupt, greed-fueled world, a powerful alchemist leads a Christ-like character and seven materialistic figures to the Holy Mountain,. Wow, indeed! Krauss discussed his criteria ln our interview last week. But it's quite a leap to say the brain doesn't know the difference between vision and memory. Extreme quantum mechanics could be the name of the speciality of SF writer (and physicist) Greg Egan. [5] Author Barrie Dolnick adds that "people don't want to learn how to do one thing. The movie gives two examples of experiments which have shown the power of the mind affecting reality. You can be accurate in one or the other, but not in both. Since its release in April 2004, this independent film has become a cult hit, playing to packed houses and grossing over $7.5 . Initially, the film was released in only two theaters: one in Yelm, Washington (the home of the producers, which is also the home of Ramtha), and the other the Bagdad Theater in Portland, Oregon, where it was filmed. There's just this little matter of the science being a bit bleep. The idea that our own perceptions can't be trusted is not new, of course. You can't just hope for the best. We don't know which way it's going to go. But I start to choke on my $8 popcorn when science is manipulated to make a cult leader's claims sound more plausible. 1. What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. This is the person who teaches the brain science in RSE. The film has a web-site, and there is a long article in Salon explaining that the whole thing is really the production of a cult based in the Pacific Northwest that believes that a woman named JZ Knight is able to channel a 35,000 year old mystic named Ramtha. Magician and skeptic James Randi, famous for debunking performers like Uri Geller, has offered his standard prize of $1 million cash money to Dr Emoto if he can get the same results when doing the water study this way. improve functionality and performance. I started out thinking that BLEEP 2 would be a ground-breaking update covering ideas and discoveries in quantum physics, brain neurology and consciousness studies introduced over a decade ago. According to Joo Magueijo, professor in theoretical physics at Imperial College, the film deliberately misquotes science. . I was expecting something pretty dumb, but am always interested to see what people think about quantum mechanics. Mon August 23, 2021: The US Food and Drug Administration on Monday granted full approval to the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine for people age 16 and older. Q: Obviously, quantum mechanics has lots of real-life applications, including in your television set and your microwave oven. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Supported by groups like the Templeton Foundation, legitimateor more creative scientists are exploring the mind-body connection, or the similarities between particle-and-wave physics and certain religious concepts like the Trinity. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); document.getElementById( "ak_js_2" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); WatchDocumentaries.com | Games | Quizzes | Contact |Privacy & Terms | Manage Cookies |Advertise | DMCA, Aleister Crowley: The Wickedest Man in the World. [3], Work was split between Toronto-based Mr. X Inc., Lost Boys Studios in Vancouver, and Atomic Visual Effects in Cape Town, South Africa. last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Why great minds can't grasp consciousness. A scientist debunks the claim that water reacts to human emotions. Many people are dubious that Penrose's suggestions are reasonable, because the brain is not an isolated quantum-mechanical system. IE 11 is not supported. I remember Hagelin wanting to discuss how quantum field theory could explain how TMers were able to levitate, something about how they did this by changing the position of the pole in the propagator. ft. house now used as offices), the Great Hall (a converted 15,375 sq. What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramthas School of Enlightenment. Even though there's lots of proof that the Moon landing happened, some people don't . It was an interesting idea aiming to solve the hierachy problem, as announced. There are also phrases plagiarized entire from "The Matrix," a far superior film treatment of the notion that reality isn't what it seems. We'll never know. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for What the Bleep Do We Know? "The theory can't predict with precision what will happen, but it knows everything that can happen and it will tell you the probability of all these things happening.". Everyone is still talking about the movie What the Bleep Do We Know!? The film "What the Bleep Do We Know?!" ), is hooked on prescription pills, and mopes about while her chirpy roommate spatters paint around their apartment. Check my single page unpublishable http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf. logged you out. Beyond fear, beyond anger. In the last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Krauss says "no area of physics stimulates more nonsense in the public arena than quantum mechanics." But quantum mechanics, for better or worse, doesn't bring any more spiritual benefits than gravity does. Down the Rabbit Hole - Quantum Edition multi-disc DVD set was released, containing two extended versions of What the Bleep Do We Know! Real news, real hope. Consciousness must be involved. What the Bleep Do We Know? Marlee Matlin, Barry Newman, Elaine Hendrix. What the Bleep Do We Know!? This is one reason physicists studying a subatomic particle create large numbers of them in particle accelerators. Im not personally familiar with any of Hagelins work but Im sure theres some good physics in there. And it certainly doesn't depend on an observer to make this happen. It's recognized as pedagogical exaggeration. But how are ordinary mortals to judge its assertions about the nature of matter, mind, and the universe? This is an explanation to help understand what might be going on, but it is not part of the theory because it is not falsifiable: it cannot be tested in such a way that, if it were false, it would fail the test (without falsifying the whole of quantum mechanics, and therefore all the other interpretations too). Within several weeks, the film had appeared in a dozen or more theaters (mostly in the western United States), and within six months it had made its way into 200 theaters across the US. With Alejandro Jodorowsky, Horacio Salinas, Zamira Saunders, Juan Ferrara. DO WE KNOW? As long as a sub-atomic particle is interacting with another sub-atomic particle, they'll both exist regardless of where you are or what you're doing. The Christian Science Monitor has expired. [7], According to Publishers Weekly, the film was one of the sleeper hits of 2004, as "word-of-mouth and strategic marketing kept it in theaters for an entire year." The following persons in the film have all spoken at RSE and sold books there. Q: You do see that in some science . 19802023 The Christian Science Monitor. As the sample size grows, so does the scientist's confidence in the statistical inferences drawn from the large sample. It was one of the most important moments in history. Suddenly people who were talking about subatomic particles are alluding to alternate universes and cosmic forces, all of which can be harnessed in the interest of making Ms. Matlin's character feel better about her thighs. He has stated in several venues that his views were totally misrepresented in the film. 3. When you hear the term "quantum consciousness," you should be suspicious. Use this form to email 'What the bleep are they on about?' ISHEAGU MASSACRE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: Isheagu is a town whose origin is traceable to the Eastern part of the contraption called Nigeria. It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. Intercut with these metaphysical ponderings is a soapy fictional narrative starring Marlee Matlin as a broken-hearted photographer. She's averse to churches (she married her husband in one, so they must be bad! Staff meetings are tedious enough give me a conscious mind with a decent filter device any day. John Hagelin was obviously a good phenomenologists. Its true that Hagelin stopped doing physics in the mid-nineties to concentrate on his other nonsense, but I can vouch for the fact that as early as 1978-9 he was heavily involved in TM and thought it had a lot to do with QFT. Regular indicators of violent crime told a different story the number of murders actually went up. We want to bridge divides to reach everyone. Daniel Monti, physician and director of the Mind-Body Medicine Program at. There are lots of things in quantum mechanics that sound like magic. John Hagelin, PhD, describes a study he did in Washington in 1992. What the Bleep Do We Know!? 2. Several books have been written about the film's remarkable grassroots marketing campaign, which led to its unprecedented success. [5], According to the makers of the film, "Bleep" is an expurgation of "fuck". For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. [8], In the Publishers Weekly article, publicist Linda Rienecker of New Page Books says that she sees the success as part of a wider phenomenon, stating "A large part of the population is seeking spiritual connections, and they have the whole world to choose from now". If we don't understand classical consciousness, how can we understand quantum consciousness? What the #$*! Study Guide", "Teaching physics mysteries versus pseudoscience", "Review: What The Bleep Do We Know!? Isnt Langs viewpoint in line with the sort of criticism that string theory receives at this web site? But that doesn't mean that astrology is true. Then we segue to a narrative starring Amanda (Marlee Maitlin), a wedding photographer who's bummed because her slimy husband cheated on her. mixed truisms with conjecture, interviews and dramatic "recreations" of the ideas being discussed, to form a kind of cohesive supposition on the link between mind and matter, biology and the Big Bang. Answer: Photographer. The film has been described as an example of quantum mysticism, and has been criticized for both misrepresenting science and containing pseudoscience. Some ideas discussed in the film are: In the narrative segments of the film, Marlee Matlin portrays Amanda, a photographer who plays the role of everywoman as she experiences her life from startlingly new and different perspectives. It's truly amazing that you can separate two elementary particles that were originally tied together, and often make a measurement of one particle that instantly affects the other, even if it's on Alpha Centauri. It took a while, but the comparison finally came through on the association of strings, as a quantum mechanical perspective, and the relationship to that movie. Of Hagelins thousands of citations, how many are from the Ellis/Nanopoulous et al paper mill? This message will appear once per week One of the scientists interviewed is John Hagelin who, besides being part of the TM cult surrounding Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, presidential candidate of the Natural Law Party, and Minister of Science and Technology of the Global Country of World Peace is a rather prominent particle theorist. Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed, 2. But the movie gradually moves to quantum 'insights' that lead a woman to toss away her antidepressant medication, to the quantum channeling of Ramtha, the 35,000-year-old Lemurian warrior, and on to even greater nonsense." The question "What the bleep do we know?" has an unambiguous answer: both surprisingly much and amazingly little. Those are two places where the quantum world leaks into the classical world. 6. But quantum mechanics rules out the possibility of hidden variables. is a 2004 American pseudo-scientific film that posits a spiritual connection between quantum physics and consciousness. Featuring two (!) Occasionally recalling a physics lesson, an acid trip, and a lost afternoon at a New Age bookstore, What The BLEEP Do We Know?! Seven Times Planet TV Studios Went Way Too Far: ReportWire.org info@planettvstudios.com nicholas@planettvstudios.com Eric@planettvstudios.com Julie@planettvstudios.com Website YouTube Channel Facebook Twitter Instagram Planet TV Studios LHTV LLC But when you hear about quantum mechanics and consciousness, you should assume the author is a crackpot unless proven otherwise. Gifted and talented kids: how do you nurture a curious mind. 3) Lots of people still hunger for a magical universe, and now hope that science can deliver it, after Nietsche's announcement of God's death. Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. He also invested over $10,000.00 in an infamous scam that infected RSE and was touted by Ramtha as a vehicle to gain fabulous wealth and many of the schools membership lost substantial sums of money. (I haven't). He claims that in over 5 hours of interviews he explained to the film makers why their concept of how Quantum Physics works has virtually no support in the scientific community. And if you really want to be friendly, ask me about "The Case forPluto.". Reality is happening in our brain all the time we're receiving it but it's not being integrated." But when animated, jive-talkin' human cells start dancing around in what appears to be the heroine's frontal lobe, all questions of spirituality pale before the sheer dreadfulness of this movie. A: Of course it does. The figures are a bit rubbery, but the idea that we're only 'aware' of a fraction of our brain's activity is both correct and a huge relief. Quotes From the Movies Science Of The Mind Fifth Dimension Joe Dispenza Get What You Want Neurons Brain Spirituality The infinite info that the brain is processing every single second tells us there is more to the world then we're perceiving it. Her perceptions of reality are challenged and she begins to realise how the material world is impacted by the consciousness of individuals and groups. The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable. the film What The Bleep Do We Know It was an information that really left me speechless and I ordered his books at once techhose.d-webhost.orphans.co.uk 2 / 11. The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too. Now comes the audio edition of the book based on the mind-boggling movie that grossed $11 million in the U.S. alone. That movie started its life as a small documentary about Spirit and Science, but grew in scope (and budget) and became What the BLEEP Do We Know!? 7. Gripping stuff, but nothing to do with our daily lives. [4] The visual-effects team, led by Evan Jacobs, worked closely with the other film-makers to create visual metaphors that would capture the essence of the film's technical subjects with attention to aesthetic detail. The article states that the domestic gross exceeded $10 million, described as not bad for a low-budget documentary, and that the DVD release attained even more significant success with over a million units shipped in the first six months following its release in March 2005. Early in the film, she is trying to take portraits at the train station, but nobody seems to be buying. [17] Eric Scerri in a review for Committee for Skeptical Inquiry dismisses it as "a hodgepodge of all kinds of crackpot nonsense," where "science [is] distorted and sensationalized". A moment in which 'the mathematical formalisms of quantum mechanics [] are stripped of all empirical content and reduced to a set of syrupy nostrums'. Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. If quantum physics baffled the late Dr. Feynman, one of its most brilliant explorers, then no one should feel embarrassed for failing to understand the subject. Blending New Age mysticism and quantum physics, What The Bleep Do We Know?! Details in the video itself.EXTENDED REFERENCES:Revelation:[a] Michael Freze, 1993, Voices, Visions, and Apparitions, OSV Publishing ISBN 087973454X page 252[b] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith[c] http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=confidence[d] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/faith[e] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faith[f] Dictionary.com. Professor Clive Greated wrote that "thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but, unfortunately, early references in the film to quantum physics are not followed through, leading to a confused message". : Down the Rabbit Hole: Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. Quantum physics doesn't need them to. Do We Know!?) I had it recommended to me by no less than three people. Columbus certainly didn't speak the language, and the locals didn't keep written records. Easton's 1897 Bible Dictionary. As the Amanda plot zooms here and there, a host of dubious evidence is marshaled to convince us that life is all about mind over matter. "If thoughts can do that to water, imagine what our thoughts can do to us" observed a fan of Dr Masaru Emoto in the movie. She works as a free-lancer for an agency, where her boss is played by Barry Newman. based on this subject nature contained, I hold these 2 films in a very high regard. The brain wasn't born yesterday. In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time "students" of Ramthas' School of enlightenment. Dr Joe Dispenza and Miceal Ledwith are both long time students and appointed teachers at Ramthas school of enlightenment (RSE). VISiT http://docsubtitles.blogspot.comsubscribe to watch full moviecheck also short trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJOrsql3KwU When a movie gets rave reviews as a mind-blowing flick about quantum physics, it's worth checking out. kazakore (kazakore) January 14, 2010, 6:30pm #10 Though not marketed as such, those who have seen it note that it degenerates into an extended infomercial for channeler J. At some point I guess he updated it to string field theory and the version you provided a link for. "What the Bleep Do We Know?" is a trendy new movie that combines the worst elements of a snooze-worthy PBS documentary, a "change your mind, change your life" self-help book, and a Bugs. In reality, science is completely incidental to the film's conclusions. We're bombarded by many things every second of the day, and a result, we're not specially prepared quantum mechanical systems, nor can we exert weird quantum powers over other objects. We all know most parts of the ocean are still undiscovered but there's plenty of theories. !" is a radical departure from convention. First, such claims rely on "hidden variables" susceptible to influence, he says. Blech. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. Here's an edited transcript: Cosmic Log: Every once in a while, you'll hear about something like "The Secret," or some other reference to quantum mechanics as explaining how you can change your universe, or even perhaps why it's in the realm of possibility that a globe-gobbling black hole could be created because "anything can happen" in quantum mechanics. And a lot of people talk about quantum consciousness that even if the everyday world we see is not a system that can be changed, our consciousness about the world can be changed. It sounds reasonable, and familiar. I was really impressed and although it sounded totally crazy, the Einsteinian language that their brochures were using had nearly convinced me that they really know something about fundamental physics.